10-Q: Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
Published on April 30, 2008
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
______________
FORM
10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For
the transition period from ______________ to ______________
Commission
File Number: 1-13991
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
______________
Maryland
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
350
Park Avenue, 21st Floor, New York, New York
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
13-3974868
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
10022
(Zip
Code)
|
(212)
207-6400
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
______________
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
151,675,335
shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value, were outstanding as of
April 28, 2008.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
PART
I
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Page
|
||||||||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
1
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
2
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
3
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
4
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
5
|
|||||||
|
6
|
|||||||
Item
2.
|
||||||||
|
27
|
|||||||
Item
3.
|
36
|
|||||||
Item
4.
|
40
|
|||||||
PART
II
OTHER INFORMATION |
||||||||
Item
1.
|
41
|
|||||||
Item
1A.
|
Risk Factors |
41
|
||||||
Item
6.
|
41
|
|||||||
43
|
MFA MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Investment
securities at fair value (including pledged mortgage-backed
securities
(“MBS”) of $8,033,950 and $8,046,947 at March 31, 2008
and
December 31, 2007, respectively) (Notes 3 and
7)
|
$ | 8,115,988 | $ | 8,302,797 | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
339,767 | 234,410 | ||||||
Restricted
cash (Note 2(d))
|
33,055 | 4,517 | ||||||
Interest
receivable (Note 4)
|
42,154 | 43,610 | ||||||
Interest
rate swap agreements (“Swaps”), at fair value (Note 5)
|
- | 103 | ||||||
Real
estate, net (Note 6)
|
11,543 | 11,611 | ||||||
Goodwill
(Note 2(f))
|
7,189 | 7,189 | ||||||
Prepaid
and other assets
|
2,069 | 1,622 | ||||||
Total
Assets
|
$ | 8,551,765 | $ | 8,605,859 | ||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Repurchase
agreements (Note 7)
|
$ | 7,311,767 | $ | 7,526,014 | ||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
23,858 | 20,212 | ||||||
Mortgage
payable on real estate (Note 6)
|
9,425 | 9,462 | ||||||
Swaps,
at fair value (Note 5)
|
141,584 | 99,836 | ||||||
Dividends
and dividend equivalents payable (Note 10(b))
|
- | 18,005 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
13,436 | 5,067 | ||||||
Total
Liabilities
|
7,500,070 | 7,678,596 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 8)
|
||||||||
Stockholders'
Equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $.01 par value; series A 8.50% cumulative redeemable;
5,000
shares authorized; 3,840 shares issued and outstanding at
March
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 ($96,000 aggregate
liquidation
preference) (Note 10)
|
38 | 38 | ||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value; 370,000 shares authorized;
151,675
and 122,887 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2008
and
December 31, 2007, respectively (Note 10)
|
1,517 | 1,229 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital, in excess of par
|
1,338,842 | 1,085,760 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(177,246 | ) | (89,263 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss (Note 12)
|
(111,456 | ) | (70,501 | ) | ||||
Total
Stockholders’ Equity
|
1,051,695 | 927,263 | ||||||
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
$ | 8,551,765 | $ | 8,605,859 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
1
For
the Three Months Ended
|
||||||||
March
31,
|
||||||||
(In
Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Interest
Income:
|
||||||||
Investment
securities (Note 3)
|
$ | 125,065 | $ | 84,347 | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalent investments
|
3,031 | 448 | ||||||
Interest
Income
|
128,096 | 84,795 | ||||||
Interest
Expense (Note 7)
|
93,472 | 72,260 | ||||||
Net
Interest Income
|
34,624 | 12,535 | ||||||
Other
(Loss)/Income:
|
||||||||
Net
(loss)/gain on sale of MBS (Note 3)
|
(24,530 | ) | 3 | |||||
Other-than-temporary
impairment on investments securities (Note 3)
|
(851 | ) | - | |||||
Revenue
from operations of real estate (Note 6)
|
414 | 413 | ||||||
Net
loss on early termination of Swaps (Note 5)
|
(91,481 | ) | - | |||||
Miscellaneous
other income, net
|
92 | 115 | ||||||
Other
(Loss)/Income
|
(116,356 | ) | 531 | |||||
Operating
and Other Expense:
|
||||||||
Compensation
and benefits (Note 13)
|
2,644 | 1,612 | ||||||
Real
estate operating expense and mortgage interest (Note 6)
|
449 | 420 | ||||||
Other
general and administrative
|
1,118 | 1,184 | ||||||
Operating and Other
Expense
|
4,211 | 3,216 | ||||||
Net
(Loss)/Income Before Preferred Stock Dividends
|
(85,943 | ) | 9,850 | |||||
Less: Preferred
Stock Dividends
|
2,040 | 2,040 | ||||||
Net (Loss)/Income to Common
Stockholders
|
$ | (87,983 | ) | $ | 7,810 | |||
(Loss)/Income
Per Share of Common Stock – Basic
and
Diluted (Note 11)
|
$ | (0.61 | ) | $ | 0.10 | |||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
2
For
the
Three
Months
Ended
|
||||
(In
Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
March
31, 2008
|
|||
(Unaudited)
|
||||
Preferred
Stock, Series A 8.50% Cumulative Redeemable – Liquidation
Preference
$25.00 per Share:
|
||||
Balance
at December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2008 (3,840 shares)
|
$ | 38 | ||
Common
Stock, Par Value $0.01:
|
||||
Balance
at December 31, 2007 (122,887 shares)
|
1,229 | |||
Issuance
of common stock, net of shares withheld (28,788
shares)
|
288 | |||
Balance
at March 31, 2008 (151,675 shares)
|
1,517 | |||
Additional Paid-in Capital, in
excess of Par:
|
||||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
1,085,760 | |||
Issuance
of common stock, net of expenses
|
252,786 | |||
Share-based
compensation expense
|
342 | |||
Shares
withheld upon exercise of common stock options (22 shares)
|
(46 | ) | ||
Balance
at March 31, 2008
|
1,338,842 | |||
Accumulated
Deficit:
|
||||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
(89,263 | ) | ||
Net
loss
|
(85,943 | ) | ||
Dividends
declared on preferred stock
|
(2,040 | ) | ||
Balance
at March 31, 2008
|
(177,246 | ) | ||
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss:
|
||||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
(70,501 | ) | ||
Unrealized
gains on investment securities, net
|
896 | |||
Unrealized
losses on Swaps
|
(41,851 | ) | ||
Balance
at March 31, 2008
|
(111,456 | ) | ||
Total
Stockholders' Equity at March 31, 2008
|
$ | 1,051,695 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
3
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||
March
31,
|
||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities:
|
||||||||
Net
(loss)/income
|
$ | (85,943 | ) | $ | 9,850 | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Losses
on sale of MBS
|
25,101 | - | ||||||
Gains
on sales of MBS
|
(571 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
Losses
on early termination of Swaps
|
91,481 | - | ||||||
Amortization
of purchase premium on MBS, net of accretion of discounts
|
5,267 | 8,343 | ||||||
Amortization
of premium cost for interest rate cap agreements (“Caps”)
|
- | 181 | ||||||
Decrease/(increase)
in interest receivable
|
1,456 | (255 | ) | |||||
Depreciation
and amortization on real estate, including discontinued
operations
|
117 | 102 | ||||||
Increase
in other assets and other
|
(542 | ) | (478 | ) | ||||
Increase/(decrease)
in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
8,369 | (949 | ) | |||||
Increase/(decrease)
in accrued interest payable
|
3,646 | (1,749 | ) | |||||
Other-than-temporary
impairment charge
|
851 | - | ||||||
Equity-based
compensation expense
|
342 | 174 | ||||||
Negative
amortization and principal accretion on investment
securities
|
(238 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
49,336 | 15,129 | ||||||
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities:
|
||||||||
Principal
payments on MBS and other investments securities
|
395,632 | 492,381 | ||||||
Proceeds
from sale of MBS
|
1,851,019 | 6,830 | ||||||
Purchases
of MBS and other investment securities
|
(2,089,356 | ) | (541,881 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided/(used) by investing activities
|
157,295 | (42,670 | ) | |||||
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities:
|
||||||||
Increase
in restricted cash
|
(28,538 | ) | - | |||||
Principal
payments on repurchase agreements
|
(15,762,869 | ) | (8,604,712 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from borrowings under repurchase agreements
|
15,548,622 | 8,645,358 | ||||||
Payments
made for termination of Swaps
|
(91,481 | ) | - | |||||
Proceeds
from issuances of common stock
|
253,074 | 364 | ||||||
Dividends
paid on preferred stock
|
(2,040 | ) | (2,040 | ) | ||||
Dividends
paid on common stock and dividend equivalent rights
(“DERs”)
|
(18,005 | ) | (4,899 | ) | ||||
Principal
payments on mortgage
|
(37 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||
Net
cash (used)/provided by financing activities
|
(101,274 | ) | 34,038 | |||||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
105,357 | 6,497 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
234,410 | 47,200 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 339,767 | $ | 53,697 | ||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
4
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||
March
31,
|
||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Net
(loss)/income before preferred stock dividends
|
$ | (85,943 | ) | $ | 9,850 | |||
Other
Comprehensive Income:
|
||||||||
Unrealized
gain on investment securities arising during the
period,
net
|
8,836 | 12,500 | ||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for MBS sales
|
(8,241 | ) | - | |||||
Reclassification
adjustment for other-than-temporary impairment
included
in net income from investment securities
|
301 | - | ||||||
Unrealized
loss on Caps arising during the period, net
|
- | (51 | ) | |||||
Unrealized
loss on Swaps arising during the period, net
|
(90,013 | ) | (4,700 | ) | ||||
Reclassification
adjustment for net losses included in net income
from
Swaps
|
48,162 | - | ||||||
Comprehensive
(loss)/income before preferred stock dividends
|
(126,898 | ) | 17,599 | |||||
Dividends
on preferred stock
|
(2,040 | ) | (2,040 | ) | ||||
Comprehensive
(Loss)/Income to Common Stockholders
|
$ | (128,938 | ) | $ | 15,559 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
5
1. Organization
MFA
Mortgage Investments, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Maryland on July
24, 1997 and began operations on April 10, 1998. The Company has
elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S.
federal income tax purposes. In order to maintain its qualification
as a REIT, the Company must comply with a number of requirements under federal
tax law, including that it must distribute at least 90% of its annual taxable
ordinary net income to its stockholders, subject to certain
adjustments. (See Note 10(b).)
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
(a)
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
The
accompanying interim unaudited financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and note disclosures normally
included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted according
to such SEC rules and regulations. Management believes, however, that
these disclosures are adequate to make the information presented therein not
misleading. The accompanying financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007. In the opinion of management, all normal and recurring
adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial condition of the Company
at March 31, 2008 and results of operations for all periods presented have been
made. The results of operations for the three-month period ended
March 31, 2008 should not be construed as indicative of the results to be
expected for the full year.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual
basis of accounting in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
(b)
MBS/Investment Securities
The
Company’s investment securities are comprised primarily of hybrid and
adjustable-rate MBS (collectively, “ARM-MBS”) that are issued or guaranteed as
to principal and/or interest by a federally chartered corporation, such as
Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, or an agency of the U.S. government, such as Ginnie
Mae (collectively, “Agency MBS”) or are rated AAA by at least one nationally
recognized rating agency, such as Moody’s Investors Services, Inc., Standard
& Poor’s Corporation or Fitch, Inc. (“Rating Agencies”). Hybrid
MBS have interest rates that are fixed for a specified period and, thereafter,
generally reset annually. To a lesser extent, the Company also holds
investments in non-Agency MBS, mortgage-related securities and other investments
that are rated below AAA. At March 31, 2008, the Company held
securities with a carrying value of $4.5 million rated below AAA, including
unrated investment securities. (See Note 3.)
The
Company accounts for its investment securities in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) No. 115, “Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” which requires that investments in
securities be designated as either “held-to-maturity,” “available-for-sale” or
“trading” at the time of acquisition. All of the Company’s investment
securities are designated as available-for-sale and are carried at their fair
value with unrealized gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income, a
component of Stockholders’ Equity. (See Notes 2(k) and
9.) The Company determines the fair value of its investment
securities based upon prices obtained from a third-party pricing service and
broker quotes.
The
Company applies the guidance prescribed in Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) Staff Position FAS 115-1 and FAS 124-1, “The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments” (the
“FASB Impairment Position”). (See Note 2(e).)
Although
the Company generally intends to hold its investment securities until maturity,
it may, from time to time, sell any of its securities as part of the overall
management of its business. The available-for-sale designation
provides the Company with the flexibility to sell its investment
securities. Upon the sale of an investment security, any unrealized
gain and loss is reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income to
earnings as a realized gain or loss using the specific identification
method.
6
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Interest
income is accrued based on the outstanding principal balance of the investment
securities and their contractual terms. Premiums and discounts
associated with Agency MBS and MBS rated AAA are amortized into interest income
over the life of such securities using the effective yield method, adjusted for
actual prepayment activity in accordance with FAS No. 91, “Accounting for
Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and
Initial Direct Costs of Leases.” Certain of the Agency MBS owned by
the Company contractually provide for negative amortization, which occurs when
the full amount of the stated coupon interest due on the distribution date for
an MBS is not received from the underlying mortgages. The Company
recognizes such interest shortfall on its Agency MBS as interest income with a
corresponding increase in the related Agency MBS principal value (i.e., par) as
the interest shortfall is guaranteed by the issuing agency.
Interest
income on the Company’s securities rated below AAA, including unrated
securities, is recognized in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”)
of the FASB Consensus No. 99-20, “Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment
on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets”
(“EITF 99-20”). Pursuant to EITF 99-20, cash flows from a
security are estimated applying assumptions used to determine the fair value of
such security and the excess of the future cash flows over the initial
investment is recognized as interest income under the effective yield
method. The Company reviews and, if appropriate, makes adjustments to
its cash flow projections at least quarterly and monitors these projections
based on input and analysis received from external sources, internal models, and
its judgment about interest rates, prepayment rates, the timing and amount of
credit losses, and other factors. Changes in cash flows from those
originally projected, or from those estimated at the last evaluation, may result
in a prospective change in interest income recognized on, or the carrying value
of, such securities.
(c) Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and
cash equivalents include cash on deposit with financial institutions and
investments in high quality overnight money market funds, all of which have
original maturities of three months or less. The carrying amount of
cash equivalents approximates their fair value.
(d) Restricted Cash
Restricted
cash represents cash held in interest-bearing accounts by counterparties as
collateral against the Company’s Swaps and/or repurchase agreements, the amount
of which varies by counterparty. Restricted cash is not available to
the Company for general corporate purposes, but may be applied to payments due
to Swap or repurchase agreement counterparties or returned to the Company in the
event that the collateral is in excess of the collateral requirements and/or at
expiration of the Swap or repurchase agreement. At March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, the Company had restricted cash held as collateral against
its Swap and repurchase agreements of $33.1 million and $4.5 million,
respectively. (See Notes 5 and 7.)
(e)
Credit Risk/Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
The
Company limits its exposure to credit losses on its investment portfolio by
requiring that at least 50% of its investment portfolio consist of hybrid and
adjustable-rate MBS that are either (i) Agency MBS or (ii) rated in one of the
two highest rating categories by at least one Rating Agency. The
remainder of the Company’s investment portfolio may consist of direct or
indirect investments in: (i) other types of MBS and residential mortgage loans;
(ii) other mortgage and real estate-related debt and equity; (iii) other yield
instruments (corporate or government); and (iv) other types of assets approved
by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) or a committee
thereof. At March 31, 2008, all of our Agency and AAA rated MBS were
secured by first lien mortgage loans on one to four family
properties. At March 31, 2008, 91.6% of the Company’s assets
consisted of Agency MBS and related receivables, 3.7% were MBS rated AAA by
Standard & Poor’s Corporation and related receivables and 4.4% were cash,
cash equivalents and restricted cash; combined these assets comprised 99.7% of
the Company’s total assets. The Company’s remaining assets consisted
of an investment in real estate, securities rated below AAA or unrated and other
assets. (See Note 3.)
The
Company accounts for its investment securities in accordance with the FASB
Impairment Position, which, among other things, specifically addresses: the
determination as to when an investment is considered impaired; whether that
impairment is other-than-temporary; the measurement of an impairment loss;
accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an
other-than-temporary impairment; and certain required disclosures about
unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary
impairments.
7
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The
Company assesses its investment securities for other-than-temporary impairment
on at least a quarterly basis. When the fair value of an investment
is less than its amortized cost at the balance sheet date of the reporting
period for which impairment is assessed, the impairment is designated as either
“temporary” or “other-than-temporary.” If it is determined that
impairment is other-than-temporary, then an impairment loss is recognized in
earnings reflecting the entire difference between the investment's cost basis
and its fair value at the balance sheet date of the reporting period for which
the assessment is made. The measurement of the impairment is not
permitted to include partial recoveries subsequent to the balance sheet
date. Following the recognition of an other-than-temporary
impairment, the fair value of the investment becomes the new cost basis of the
investment and is not adjusted for subsequent recoveries in fair value through
earnings. Because management’s assessments are based on factual
information as well as subjective information available at the time of
assessment, the determination as to whether an other-than-temporary impairment
exists and, if so, the amount considered impaired, or not impaired, is
subjective and, therefore, constitute material estimates that are susceptible to
significant change.
Upon a
decision to sell an impaired available-for-sale investment security on which the
Company does not expect the fair value of the investment to fully recover prior
to the expected time of sale, the investment shall be deemed
other-than-temporarily impaired in the period in which the decision to sell is
made. The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the impairment
is deemed other-than-temporary even if a decision to sell has not been
made. The Company did not recognize any other-than-temporary
impairment on any of its Agency MBS during the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2007.
Certain
of the Company’s investment securities rated below AAA were purchased at a
discount to par value, with a portion of such discount considered credit
protection against future credit losses. The initial credit
protection (i.e., discount) on these MBS may be adjusted over time, based on
review of the investment or, if applicable, its underlying collateral, actual
and projected cash flow from such collateral, economic conditions and other
factors. If the performance of these securities is more favorable
than forecasted, a portion of the amount designated as credit discount may be
accreted into interest income over time. Conversely, if the
performance of these securities is less favorable than forecasted, impairment
charges and a write down of such security to a new cost basis could
result. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company
recognized an impairment charge of $851,000 against one of its unrated
securities with an amortized cost, prior to recognizing such impairment, of $1.9
million. The Company did not have any impairment charges against any
of its securities rated below AAA during the quarter ended March 31,
2007. At March 31, 2008, the Company had $4.5 million, or 0.1% (i.e.,
1/10 of 1%) of its assets, invested in investment securities rated below AAA or
unrated. (See Note 3.)
(f)
Goodwill
The
Company accounts for its goodwill in accordance with FAS No. 142, "Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets" (“FAS 142”) which provides, among other things, how
entities are to account for goodwill and other intangible assets that arise from
business combinations or are otherwise acquired. FAS 142 requires
that goodwill be tested for impairment annually or more frequently under certain
circumstances. At March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company
had goodwill of $7.2 million, which represents the unamortized portion of the
excess of the fair value of its common stock issued over the fair value of net
assets acquired in connection with its formation in 1998. Goodwill is
tested for impairment at least annually at the entity level. Through
March 31, 2008, the Company had not recognized any impairment against its
goodwill.
(g)
Real Estate
At March
31, 2008, the Company indirectly held 100% of the ownership interest in Lealand
Place, a 191-unit apartment property located in Lawrenceville, Georgia
(“Lealand”), which is consolidated with the Company. This property
was acquired through a tax-deferred exchange under Section 1031 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). (See Note
6.)
The
property, capital improvements and other assets held in connection with this
investment are carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Maintenance, repairs and minor improvements are
expensed in the period incurred, while real estate assets, except land, and
capital improvements are depreciated over their useful life using the
straight-line method.
8
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
(h)
Repurchase Agreements
The
Company finances the acquisition of its MBS through the use of repurchase
agreements. Under these repurchase agreements, the Company sells
securities to a lender and agrees to repurchase the same securities in the
future for a price that is higher than the original sale price. The
difference between the sale price that the Company receives and the repurchase
price that the Company pays represents interest paid to the
lender. Although structured as a sale and repurchase, under
repurchase agreements, the Company pledges its securities as collateral to
secure a loan which is equal in value to a specified percentage of the fair
value of the pledged collateral, while the Company retains beneficial ownership
of the pledged collateral. At the maturity of a repurchase agreement,
the Company is required to repay the loan and concurrently receives back its
pledged collateral from the lender. With the consent of the lender,
the Company may renew a repurchase agreement at the then prevailing financing
terms. Margin calls, whereby a lender requires that the Company
pledge additional securities or cash as collateral to secure borrowings under
its repurchase agreements with such lender, are routinely experienced by the
Company as the value of the MBS pledged as collateral declines due to scheduled
monthly amortization and prepayments of principal on such MBS. In
addition, margin calls may also occur when the fair value of the MBS pledged as
collateral declines due to changes in market interest rates, spreads or other
market conditions. Through March 31, 2008, the Company had satisfied
all of its margin calls. (See Note 7.)
Original
terms to maturity of the Company’s repurchase agreements generally range from
one month to 60 months. Should a counterparty decide not to renew a
repurchase agreement at maturity, the Company must either refinance elsewhere or
be in a position to satisfy this obligation. If, during the term of a
repurchase agreement, a lender should file for bankruptcy, the Company might
experience difficulty recovering its pledged assets and may have an unsecured
claim against the lender’s assets for the difference between the amount loaned
to the Company plus interest due to the counterparty and the fair value of the
collateral pledged to such lender. The Company generally seeks to
diversify its exposure by entering into repurchase agreements with at least four
separate lenders with a maximum loan from any lender of no more than three times
the Company’s stockholders’ equity. At March 31, 2008, the Company
had outstanding balances under repurchase agreements with 15 separate lenders
with a maximum net exposure (the difference between the amount loaned to the
Company, including interest payable, and the fair value of the securities
pledged by the Company as collateral, including accrued interest on such
securities) to any single lender of $103.4 million related to repurchase
agreements, or 9.8% of stockholders’ equity. (See Note
7.)
(i)
Equity Based Compensation
The
Company accounts for its stock-based compensation in accordance with FAS No.
123R, “Share-Based Payment,” (“FAS 123R”). The Company uses the
Black-Scholes-Merton option model to value its stock options. There
are limitations inherent in this model, as with all other models currently used
in the market place to value stock options. For example, the
Black-Scholes-Merton option model has not been designed to value stock options
which contain significant restrictions and forfeiture risks, such as those
contained in the stock options that are issued to certain
employees. Significant assumptions are made in order to determine the
Company’s option value, all of which are subjective. The fair value
of the Company’s stock options are expensed using the straight-line
method.
Pursuant
to FAS 123R, compensation expense for restricted stock awards, restricted stock
units (“RSUs”) and stock options is recognized over the vesting period of such
awards, based upon the fair value of such awards at the grant
date. DERs attached to such awards are charged to stockholders’
equity when declared. Equity based awards for which there is no risk
of forfeiture are expensed upon grant, or at such time that there is no longer a
risk of forfeiture. A zero forfeiture rate is applied to the
Company’s equity based awards, given that such awards have been granted to a
limited number of employees, (primarily long-term executives that have
employment agreements with the Company) and that historical forfeiture rates
have been minimal. Should information arise indicating that
forfeitures may occur, the forfeiture rate would be revised and accounted for as
a change in estimate. Grantees are not required to return the
dividends or DERs if their awards do not vest. Accordingly, payments
made on instruments that ultimately do not vest are recognized as additional
compensation expense at the time an award is forfeited. There were no
forfeitures of any equity based compensation awards during the quarters ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. (See Note 13.)
(j)
Earnings per Common Share (“EPS”)
Basic EPS
is computed by dividing net income/(loss) available to holders of common stock
by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the
period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net
9
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
income
available to holders of common stock by the weighted average shares of common
stock and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. For
the diluted EPS calculation, common equivalent shares outstanding includes the
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding adjusted for the
effect of dilutive unexercised stock options and RSUs outstanding using the
treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, common
equivalent shares are calculated assuming that all dilutive common stock
equivalents are exercised and the proceeds, along with future compensation
expenses for unvested stock options and RSUs, are used to repurchase shares of
the Company’s outstanding common stock at the average market price during the
reported period. No common share equivalents are included in the
computation of any diluted per share amount for a period in which a net
operating loss is reported. (See Note 11.)
(k)
Comprehensive Income/Loss
Comprehensive
income/(loss) for the Company includes net income/(loss), the change in net
unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities and derivative hedging
instruments, adjusted by realized net gain/(loss) included in net income for the
period and reduced by dividends on the Company’s preferred stock.
(l)
U.S. Federal Income Taxes
The
Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the provisions of the Code and
the corresponding provisions of state law. The Company expects to
operate in a manner that will enable it to continue to be taxed as a
REIT. A REIT is not subject to tax on its earnings to the extent that
it distributes its taxable ordinary net income to its
stockholders. As such, no provision for current or deferred income
taxes has been made in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
(m)
Derivative
Financial Instruments/Hedging Activity
The
Company hedges a portion of its interest rate risk through the use of derivative
financial instruments, which, to date, have been comprised of Swaps and Caps
(collectively, “Hedging Instruments”). The Company accounts for
Hedging Instruments in accordance with FAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FAS 133”) as amended by FAS No. 138,
“Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities,”
and FAS No. 149 “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities.” The Company’s Hedging Instruments are carried on
the balance sheet at their fair value, as assets, if their fair value is
positive, or as liabilities, if their fair value is negative. Since
the Company’s Hedging Instruments are designated as “cash flow hedges,” the
change in the fair value of any such instrument is recorded in other
comprehensive income for hedges that qualify as an effective hedge and is
transferred from other comprehensive income to earnings as the hedged liability
affects earnings. The change in fair value of any ineffective amount
of a Hedging Instrument is recognized in earnings. To date, except
for gains and losses realized on Swaps terminated early and deemed ineffective,
the Company has not recognized any change in the value of its Hedging
Instruments in earnings as a result of the hedge or a portion thereof being
ineffective.
Upon
entering into hedging transactions, the Company documents the relationship
between the Hedging Instruments and the hedged liability. The Company
also documents its risk-management policies, including objectives and
strategies, as they relate to its hedging activities. The Company
assesses, both at inception of a hedge and on an on-going basis, whether or not
the hedge is “highly effective,” as defined by FAS 133. The Company
discontinues hedge accounting on a prospective basis and recognizes changes in
fair value reflected in earnings when: (i) it is determined that the
derivative is no longer effective in offsetting cash flows of a hedged item
(including forecasted transactions); (ii) it is no longer probable that the
forecasted transaction will occur; or (iii) it is determined that
designating the derivative as a Hedging Instrument is no longer
appropriate.
The
Company utilizes Hedging Instruments to manage a portion of its interest rate
risk and does not enter into derivative transactions for speculative or trading
purposes. (See Note 5.)
Interest
Rate Swaps
No cost
is incurred by the Company at the inception of a Swap; however, in certain
cases, the Company is required to pledge cash or securities equal to a specified
percentage of the notional amount of the Swap to the counterparty as
collateral. When the Company enters into a Swap, it agrees to pay a
fixed rate of interest and to receive a variable interest rate, based on the
London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). The Company’s Swaps are
designated as cash flow hedges against certain of its current and forecasted
borrowings under repurchase agreements.
10
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
While the
fair value of the Company’s Swaps are reflected in the consolidated balance
sheets, the notional amounts are not. All changes in the value of
Swaps are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, provided that the
hedge remains effective. Interest rate swap values are typically
based upon their terms relative to the forward curve at the valuation
date. The Company also independently reviews the valuations it
receives from Swap counterparties for reasonableness relative to the forward
curve to assure that the amount at which the Swap could be settled is fair
value. If it becomes probable that the forecasted transaction (which
in this case refers to interest payments to be made under the Company’s
short-term borrowing agreements) will not occur by the end of the originally
specified time period, as documented at the inception and throughout the term of
the hedging relationship, then the related gain or loss in accumulated other
comprehensive income is recognized through earnings.
The gain
or loss from a terminated Swap remains in accumulated other comprehensive income
until the forecasted interest payments affect earnings. However, if
it is probable that the forecasted interest payments will not occur, then the
entire gain or loss is recognized though earnings.
(n)
Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Interpretations
Fair
Value Measurements
On
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted FAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”
(“FAS 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements.
The
changes to previous practice resulting from the application of FAS 157 relate to
the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the
expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. The definition of
fair value retains the exchange price notion used in earlier definitions of fair
value. FAS 157 clarifies that the exchange price is the price in an
orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer
the liability in the market in which the reporting entity would transact for the
asset or liability, that is, the principal or most advantageous market for the
asset or liability. The transaction to sell the asset or transfer the
liability is a hypothetical transaction at the measurement date, considered from
the perspective of a market participant that holds the asset or owes the
liability. FAS 157 provides a consistent definition of fair value
which focuses on exit price and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value,
the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs. In
addition, FAS 157 provides a framework for measuring fair value, and establishes
a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the transparency
of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement
date. (See Note 9.)
FAS No.
159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”
(“FAS 159”) permits entities to elect to measure many financial instruments and
certain other items at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on
items for which the fair value option has been elected will be recognized in
earnings at each subsequent reporting date. A decision to elect the
fair value option for an eligible financial instrument, which can be made on an
instrument by instrument basis, is irrevocable. The Company’s
adoption of FAS 159 on January 1, 2008 did not have a material impact on the its
consolidated financial statements as the Company did not elect the fair value
option.
FASB
Interpretation No. 39-1, “Amendment of FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 39.”
(“FIN 39-1”), defines “right of setoff” and specifies what conditions must be
met for a derivative contract to qualify for this right of
setoff. FIN 39-1 also addresses the applicability of a right of
setoff to derivative instruments and clarifies the circumstances in which it is
appropriate to offset amounts recognized for those instruments in the balance
sheet. In addition, FIN 39-1 permits offsetting of fair value amounts
recognized for multiple derivative instruments executed with the same
counterparty under a master netting arrangement and fair value amounts
recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the
obligation to return cash collateral (a payable) arising from the same master
netting arrangement as the derivative instruments. The Company’s
adoption of FIN 39-1 on January 1, 2008 did not have any impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
(o)
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
On March
20, 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“FAS
161”). FAS 161 provides for enhanced disclosures about how and why an
entity uses derivatives and how and where those derivatives and related hedged
items are
11
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
reported
in the entity’s financial statements. FAS 161 also requires certain
tabular formats for disclosing such information. FAS 161 is
effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008
(i.e., calendar year 2009 for the Company) with early application
encouraged. FAS 161 applies to all entities and all derivative
instruments and related hedged items accounted for under FAS
133. Among other things, FAS 161 requires disclosures of an entity’s
objectives and strategies for using derivatives by primary underlying risk and
certain disclosures about the potential future collateral or cash requirements
(that is, the effect on the entity’s liquidity) as a result of contingent
credit-related features. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact that the adoption of FAS 161 will have on its consolidated financial
statements.
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 140-3, “Accounting
for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions,” (“FSP
140-3”), which provides guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assets
and repurchase financings. FSP 140-3 presumes that an initial
transfer of a financial asset and a repurchase financing are considered part of
the same arrangement (i.e., a linked transaction) under FAS No. 140 “Accounting
for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities” (“FAS 140”). However, if certain criteria, as described
in FSP 140-3, are met, the initial transfer and repurchase financing shall not
be evaluated as a linked transaction and shall be evaluated separately under FAS
140. If the linked transaction does not meet the requirements for
sale accounting, the linked transaction shall generally be accounted for as a
forward contract, as opposed to the current presentation, where the purchased
asset and the repurchase liability are reflected separately on the balance
sheet.
FSP 140-3
is effective on a prospective basis for fiscal years beginning after November
15, 2008, with earlier application not permitted. Given that FSP
140-3 is to be applied prospectively, the Company does not expect that the
adoption of FSP 140-3, will have a material impact on the Company’s financial
statements.
In June
2007, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) issued
Statement of Position (“SOP”) 07-01 “Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and
Accounting Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity
Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies” (“SOP 07-1”) which
provides guidance for determining whether an entity is within the scope of the
guidance in the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment
Companies. On February 6, 2008, the FASB indefinitely deferred the
effective date of SOP 07-1.
(p)
Reclassifications
Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
12
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
3. Investment
Securities
At March
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company’s investment securities portfolio
consisted primarily of pools of ARM-MBS, which were primarily comprised of
Agency MBS and non-Agency MBS that were rated AAA by one or more of the Rating
Agencies. The following tables present certain information about the
Company's investment securities at March 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007.
March
31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
Principal/
Current Face
|
Purchase
Premiums
|
Purchase
Discounts
|
Amortized
Cost (1)
|
Carrying
Value/
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized Losses
|
Net
Unrealized Gain/(Loss)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agency
MBS:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fannie
Mae Certificates
|
$ | 7,122,234 | $ | 100,496 | $ | (1,046 | ) | $ | 7,221,684 | $ | 7,291,068 | $ | 83,978 | $ | (14,594 | ) | $ | 69,384 | ||||||||||||||
Ginnie
Mae Certificates
|
38,730 | 682 | - | 39,412 | 39,639 | 310 | (83 | ) | 227 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Freddie
Mac Certificates
|
441,252 | 7,113 | - | 462,512 | 465,323 | 3,677 | (866 | ) | 2,811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Agency
MBS: (2)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rated
AAA
|
353,673 | 2,233 | (704 | ) | 355,202 | 315,433 | - | (39,769 | ) | (39,769 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Rated
AA+
|
1,109 | - | (2 | ) | 1,107 | 975 | - | (132 | ) | (132 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Rated
single A+
|
776 | - | (2 | ) | 774 | 637 | - | (137 | ) | (137 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Rated
BBB+
|
439 | - | - | 439 | 351 | - | (88 | ) | (88 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Rated
BB and below
|
632 | - | - | 632 | 559 | 7 | (80 | ) | (73 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrated
|
3,034 | - | - | 3,034 | 939 | 29 | (2,124 | ) | (2,095 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
MBS
|
$ | 7,961,879 | $ | 110,524 | $ | (1,754 | ) | $ | 8,084,796 | $ | 8,114,924 | $ | 88,001 | $ | (57,873 | ) | $ | 30,128 | ||||||||||||||
Income
notes, unrated
|
- | - | - | 1,064 | 1,064 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
investment securities
|
$ | 7,961,879 | $ | 110,524 | $ | (1,754 | ) | $ | 8,085,860 | $ | 8,115,988 | $ | 88,001 | $ | (57,873 | ) | $ | 30,128 | ||||||||||||||
December
31, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
Principal/
Current Face
|
Purchase
Premiums
|
Purchase
Discounts
|
Amortized
Cost (1)
|
Carrying
Value/
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized Losses
|
Net
Unrealized Gain/(Loss)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agency
MBS:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fannie
Mae Certificates
|
$ | 7,157,079 | $ | 91,610 | $ | (706 | ) | $ | 7,247,983 | $ | 7,287,111 | $ | 47,486 | $ | (8,358 | ) | $ | 39,128 | ||||||||||||||
Ginnie
Mae Certificates
|
172,340 | 3,173 | - | 175,513 | 174,089 | 78 | (1,502 | ) | (1,424 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Freddie
Mac Certificates
|
393,441 | 6,221 | - | 409,337 | 408,792 | 781 | (1,326 | ) | (545 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Agency
MBS:
(2)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rated
AAA
|
430,025 | 2,341 | (987 | ) | 431,379 | 424,954 | 97 | (6,522 | ) | (6,425 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Rated
AA+
|
1,413 | - | - | 1,413 | 1,392 | - | (21 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Rated
single A+
|
989 | - | (3 | ) | 986 | 967 | - | (19 | ) | (19 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Rated
BBB+
|
559 | - | - | 559 | 543 | - | (16 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Rated
BB and below
|
1,512 | - | - | 1,512 | 1,646 | 134 | - | 134 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrated
|
2,968 | - | - | 2,968 | 1,689 | 35 | (1,314 | ) | (1,279 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
MBS
|
$ | 8,160,326 | $ | 103,345 | $ | (1,696 | ) | $ | 8,271,650 | $ | 8,301,183 | $ | 48,611 | $ | (19,078 | ) | $ | 29,533 | ||||||||||||||
Income
notes, unrated
|
- | - | - | 1,915 | 1,614 | - | (301 | ) | (301 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
investment securities
|
$ | 8,160,326 | $ | 103,345 | $ | (1,696 | ) | $ | 8,273,565 | $ | 8,302,797 | $ | 48,611 | $ | (19,379 | ) | $ | 29,232 | ||||||||||||||
(1) Includes
principal payments receivable, which is not included in the
Principal/Current Face.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) Based
upon ratings by Standard & Poor's Corporation.
|
Agency
MBS: Agency
MBS are guaranteed as to principal and/or interest by a federally chartered
corporation, such as Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, or an agency of the U.S.
government, such as Ginnie Mae, and, as such, carry an implied AAA
rating. The payment of principal and/or interest on Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac MBS is guaranteed by those respective agencies and the payment of
principal and/or interest on Ginnie Mae MBS is backed by the full faith and
credit of the U.S. government.
13
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Non-Agency
MBS: The Company’s non-Agency MBS are certificates that are
backed by pools of single-family mortgage loans, which are not guaranteed by the
U.S. government, any federal agency or any federally chartered
corporation. Non-Agency MBS may be rated from AAA to B by one or more
of the Rating Agencies or may be unrated (i.e., not assigned a rating by any of
the Rating Agencies). The rating indicates the credit worthiness of
the investment, indicating the obligor’s ability to meet its financial
commitment on the obligation.
Other
Investments: At March 31, 2008, the Company had $1.1 million
invested in income notes, which are unrated securities collateralized by capital
securities of a diversified pool of issuers, consisting primarily of depository
institutions and insurance companies. The Company recognized an
other-than-temporary impairment charge of $851,000 against the income notes,
which had an amortized cost of $1.9 million prior to recognizing such
impairment, as it did not expect to hold this investment until possible
recovery.
The
Company monitors the performance and market value of its investment securities
portfolio on an ongoing basis. The following table presents
information about the Company’s investment securities that were in an unrealized
loss position at March 31, 2008.
Unrealized
Loss Position For:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less
than 12 Months
|
12
Months or more
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
Number
of Securities
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
Number
of Securities
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agency
MBS:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fannie
Mae
|
$ | 1,087,347 | $ | 5,174 | 76 | $ | 607,197 | $ | 9,420 | 109 | $ | 1,694,544 | $ | 14,594 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ginnie
Mae
|
1,087 | 3 | 1 | 10,874 | 80 | 6 | 11,961 | 83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Freddie
Mac
|
108,918 | 177 | 13 | 46,609 | 689 | 27 | 155,527 | 866 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Agency
MBS:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rated
AAA
|
184,044 | 18,678 | 3 | 131,388 | 21,091 | 13 | 315,432 | 39,769 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rated
AA
|
976 | 132 | 1 | - | - | - | 976 | 132 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rated
A
|
637 | 137 | 1 | - | - | - | 637 | 137 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rated
BBB+
|
350 | 88 | 1 | - | - | - | 350 | 88 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rated
BB and below
|
420 | 80 | 2 | - | - | - | 420 | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrated
|
905 | 2,124 | 1 | - | - | - | 905 | 2,124 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
temporarily
impaired
securities
|
$ | 1,384,684 | $ | 26,593 | 99 | $ | 796,068 | $ | 31,280 | 155 | $ | 2,180,752 | $ | 57,873 |
During
the first quarter of 2008, in response to tightening of credit conditions, the
Company adjusted its balance sheet strategy decreasing its target debt-to-equity
multiple range to 7x to 9x from a historical range of 8x to 9x. In
order to reduce its borrowings, the Company sold MBS with an amortized cost of
$1.876 billion, realizing aggregate net losses of $24.5 million, comprised of
gross losses of $25.1 million and gross gains of $571,000.
At March
31, 2008, the Company determined that it had the intent and ability to continue
to hold its MBS on which it had unrealized losses until recovery of such
unrealized losses or until maturity, such that the impairment of these
securities was considered temporary. In making this determination,
the Company considered that the decline in the value of Agency MBS was primarily
related to changes in market interest rates and the widening of spreads, related
to the current credit environment, as the receipt of par is guaranteed by the
respective Agency guarantor and that all of the non-Agency securities in an
unrealized loss position at March 31, 2008 had maintained their
rating. However, such assessment may change over time given, among
other things, the dynamic nature of interest rate markets and other
variables. Future sales or changes in the Company’s assessment of its
ability and/or intent to hold impaired investment securities until recovery or
maturity could result in the Company recognizing other-than-temporary impairment
charges or realized losses in the future.
14
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The
following table presents the impact of the Company’s investment securities on
its other comprehensive income/(loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2008
and 2007.
Three
Months Ended
March 31,
|
||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income/(loss) from
investment
securities:
|
||||||||
Unrealized
gain/(loss) on investment securities at beginning of
period
|
$ | 29,232 | $ | (30,995 | ) | |||
Unrealized
gain on investment securities, net
|
8,836 | 12,500 | ||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for MBS sales
|
(8,241 | ) | - | |||||
Reclassification
adjustment for other-than-temporary impairment
included
in net income from investment securities
|
301 | - | ||||||
Balance
at the end of period
|
$ | 30,128 | $ | (18,495 | ) |
The
following table presents components of interest income on the Company’s MBS
portfolio for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
Three
Months Ended
March 31,
|
||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Coupon
interest on MBS
|
$ | 130,282 | $ | 92,684 | ||||
Premium
amortization
|
(5,358 | ) | (8,344 | ) | ||||
Discount
accretion
|
91 | 1 | ||||||
Interest
income on MBS, net
|
$ | 125,015 | $ | 84,341 |
The
following table presents certain information about the Company’s MBS that will
reprice or amortize based on contractual terms, which do not consider
prepayments assumptions, at March 31, 2008.
March
31, 2008
|
||||||||||||
Months
to Coupon Reset or Contractual Payment
|
Fair
Value
|
%
of Total
|
WAC (1)
|
|||||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Within
one month
|
$ | 509,663 | 6.3 | % | 6.31 | % | ||||||
One
to three months
|
153,443 | 1.9 | 6.10 | |||||||||
Three
to 12 Months
|
303,330 | 3.7 | 6.24 | |||||||||
One
to two years
|
87,424 | 1.1 | 5.59 | |||||||||
Two
to three years
|
438,326 | 5.4 | 6.04 | |||||||||
Three
to five years
|
2,395,896 | 29.5 | 5.95 | |||||||||
Five
to 10 years
|
4,226,842 | 52.1 | 5.83 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 8,114,924 | 100.0 | % | 5.93 | % |
(1) "WAC"
is the weighted average coupon rate on the Company’s MBS, which is higher than
the net yield that will be earned on such MBS. The net yield is
primarily reduced by net premium amortization and the contractual delay in
receiving payments, which delay varies by issuer.
15
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The
following table presents information about the Company's MBS pledged as
collateral under repurchase agreements and in connection with Swaps at March 31,
2008.
MBS
Pledged Under Repurchase Agreements
|
MBS
Pledged for Swaps
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MBS
Pledged
|
Fair
Value/ Carrying Value
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Accrued
Interest on Pledged MBS
|
Fair
Value/ Carrying Value
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Accrued
Interest on Pledged Swaps
|
Total
Fair Value of MBS Pledged and Accrued Interest
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fannie
Mae
|
$ | 7,159,637 | $ | 7,089,894 | $ | 34,377 | $ | 86,770 | $ | 87,147 | $ | 451 |
$
|
7,281,235
|
||||||||||||||
Freddie
Mac
|
409,699 | 406,550 | 4,091 | 32,764 | 32,994 | 369 |
446,923
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Ginnie
Mae
|
23,517 | 23,388 | 119 | 12,421 | 12,291 | 66 |
36,123
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rated
AAA
|
309,142 | 346,548 | 1,640 | - | - | - |
310,782
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 7,901,995 | $ | 7,866,380 | $ | 40,227 | $ | 131,955 | $ | 132,432 | $ | 886 |
$
|
8,075,063
|
4. Interest
Receivable
The
following table presents the Company’s interest receivable by investment
category at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
(In
Thousands)
|
March 31,
2008
|
December 31,
2007
|
||||||
Interest
Receivable on:
|
||||||||
Fannie
Mae MBS
|
$ | 35,062 | $ | 36,376 | ||||
Ginnie
Mae MBS
|
200 | 870 | ||||||
Freddie
Mac MBS
|
5,053 | 4,177 | ||||||
MBS
rated AAA
|
1,684 | 2,070 | ||||||
MBS
rated AA
|
6 | 7 | ||||||
MBS
rated A & A-
|
4 | 5 | ||||||
MBS
rated BBB and BBB-
|
2 | 3 | ||||||
MBS
rated BB and below
|
3 | 6 | ||||||
Unrated
MBS
|
1 | 1 | ||||||
MBS
interest receivable
|
$ | 42,015 | $ | 43,515 | ||||
Income
notes
|
- | 3 | ||||||
Cash
investments
|
139 | 92 | ||||||
Total
interest receivable
|
$ | 42,154 | $ | 43,610 | ||||
5. Hedging
Instruments
As part
of the Company’s interest rate risk management process, it periodically hedges a
portion of its interest rate risk by entering into derivative financial
instrument contracts. At and for the quarter ended March 31, 2008,
the Company’s derivatives were entirely comprised of Swaps, which have the
effect of modifying the repricing characteristics of the Company’s repurchase
agreements and cash flows on such liabilities. In addition, the
Company is required to pledge assets as collateral for certain of its Swaps,
which collateral varies over time based on the market value, notional amount and
remaining term of the Swap. The Company had MBS with a fair value of
$132.0 million and $79.9 million pledged as collateral against its Swaps at
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. In addition, the
Company had $7.3 million and $4.5 million of cash (i.e., restricted cash)
pledged against Swaps at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively. The use of Hedging Instruments exposes the Company to
counterparty credit risks. In the event of a default by a Swap
counterparty, the Company may not receive payments provided for under the terms
of its Swaps, and may have difficulty receiving back its assets pledged as
collateral against its Swaps.
16
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following table presents the impact
of the Company’s Hedging Instruments on the Company’s other comprehensive loss
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
For
the Three Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive (loss)/income from
Hedging
Instruments:
|
||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period
|
$ | (99,733 | ) | $ | 602 | |||
Unrealized
(loss)/gain on Hedging Instruments, net
|
(90,013 | ) | (4,751 | ) | ||||
Reclassification
adjustment for net losses included in
net
income from Swaps
|
48,162 | - | ||||||
Balance
at the end of period
|
$ | (141,584 | ) | $ | (4,149 | ) |
(a)
Interest Rate Swaps
Swaps are
used by the Company to lock in a fixed interest rate on a portion of its current
and anticipated future repurchase agreements. During the three months
ended March 31, 2008, the Company terminated 48 Swaps with an aggregate notional
amount of $1.637 billion, resulting in net realized losses of $91.5 million and,
in connection therewith, repaid the repurchase agreements that such Swaps
hedged.
The
following table presents the weighted average rate paid and received for the
Company’s Swaps and the net impact of Swaps on the Company’s interest expense
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
For
the Three Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
(Dollars
In Thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Weighted
average Swap rate paid
|
4.58 | % | 4.97 | % | ||||
Weighted
average Swap rate received
|
3.84 | % | 5.33 | % | ||||
Net
addition to/(reduction of) interest expense
from
Swaps
|
$ | 9,331 | $ | (1,662 | ) |
At March
31, 2008, the Company’s had Swaps with an aggregate notional balance of $4.226
billion, which had gross unrealized losses of $141.6 million. At
March 31, 2008, the Company’s Swaps extended 29 months on average with a maximum
term of seven years. The following table presents information about
the Company’s Swaps at March 31, 2008, all of which were active.
March
31, 2008
|
||||||||
Maturity
(1)
|
Notional
Amount
|
Weighted
Average Fixed Pay Interest Rate
|
||||||
(Dollars
In Thousands)
|
||||||||
Within
30 days
|
$ | 83,462 | 3.92 | % | ||||
Over
30 days to 3 months
|
166,242 | 4.06 | ||||||
Over
3 months to 6 months
|
236,105 | 4.03 | ||||||
Over
6 months to 12 months
|
469,561 | 4.06 | ||||||
Over
12 months to 24 months
|
933,566 | 4.15 | ||||||
Over
24 months to 36 months
|
846,014 | 4.19 | ||||||
Over
36 months to 48 months
|
530,755 | 4.16 | ||||||
Over
48 months to 60 months
|
597,412 | 4.40 | ||||||
Over
60 months
|
362,541 | 4.22 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 4,225,658 | 4.17 | % | ||||
(1)
Reflects contractual amortization of notional amounts.
|
17
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
(b)
Interest Rate Caps
Caps are
designated by the Company as cash flow hedges against interest rate risk
associated with the Company’s existing and forecasted repurchase
agreements. When the 30-day LIBOR increases above the rate specified
in the Cap Agreement during the effective term of the Cap, the Company receives
monthly payments from its Cap counterparty. The Company had no Caps
at or during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
The
following table presents the impact of Caps on the Company’s interest expense
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007.
For
the Three Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Premium
amortization on Caps
|
$ | - | $ | 181 | ||||
Payments
earned on Caps
|
- | (196 | ) | |||||
Net
decrease to interest expense related to Caps
|
$ | - | $ | (15 | ) |
6. Real
Estate
The
Company’s investment in real estate at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
which is consolidated with the Company, was comprised of an indirect 100%
ownership interest in Lealand, a 191-unit apartment property located in
Lawrenceville, Georgia.
The
following table presents the summary of assets and liabilities of Lealand at
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
March
31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Real
Estate Assets and Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Land
and buildings, net of accumulated depreciation
|
$ | 11,543 | $ | 11,611 | ||||
Cash
|
29 | 26 | ||||||
Prepaid
and other assets
|
132 | 260 | ||||||
Mortgage
payable (1)
|
(9,425 | ) | (9,462 | ) | ||||
Accrued
interest and other payables
|
(133 | ) | (256 | ) | ||||
Real
estate assets, net
|
$ | 2,146 | $ | 2,179 | ||||
(1) The
mortgage collateralized by Lealand is non-recourse, subject to customary
non-recourse exceptions, which generally means that the lender’s final source of
repayment in the event of default is foreclosure of the property securing such
loan. This mortgage has a fixed interest rate of 6.87%, contractually
matures on February 1, 2011 and is subject to a penalty if
prepaid. The Company has a loan to Lealand which had a balance of
$185,000 at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. This loan and the
related interest accounts are eliminated in consolidation.
The
following table presents the summary results of operations for Lealand for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007:
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Revenue
from operations of real estate
|
$ | 414 | $ | 413 | ||||
Mortgage
interest expense
|
(163 | ) | (167 | ) | ||||
Other
real estate operations expense
|
(286 | ) | (253 | ) | ||||
Loss
from real estate operations, net
|
$ | (35 | ) | $ | (7 | ) | ||
7. Repurchase
Agreements
The
Company’s repurchase agreements are collateralized by the Company’s MBS and cash
and typically bear interest at rates that are LIBOR-based. At March
31, 2008, the Company’s repurchase agreements had a weighted average remaining
contractual maturity of approximately five months and an effective repricing
period of 21 months, including the impact of related Swaps. At
December 31, 2007, the Company’s repurchase agreements had a
18
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
weighted
average remaining contractual maturity of approximately five months and an
effective repricing period of 23 months, including the impact of related
Swaps.
At March
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company's repurchase agreements had a
weighted average interest rate of 3.50% and 5.06%, respectively. The following
table presents contractual repricing information about the Company’s repurchase
agreements, which does not reflect the impact of related Swaps that hedge
existing and forecasted repurchase agreements, at March 31, 2008.
March
31, 2008
|
||||||||
Weighted
Average
|
||||||||
Maturity
(1)
|
Balance
|
Interest
Rate
|
||||||
(Dollars
In Thousands)
|
||||||||
Within
30 days
|
$ |
3,421,611
|
3.05 | % | ||||
Over
30 days to 3 months
|
2,297,541
|
3.32 | ||||||
Over
3 months to 6 months
|
258,806 | 3.42 | ||||||
Over
6 months to 12 months
|
144,358 | 4.95 | ||||||
Over
12 months to 24 months
|
936,678 | 5.16 | ||||||
Over
24 months to 36 months
|
94,873 | 4.30 | ||||||
Over
36 months
|
157,900 | 4.02 | ||||||
$ | 7,311,767 | 3.50 | % | |||||
(1)
Swaps, which are not reflected in the table, in effect modify the
repricing period and rate paid on the Company’s repurchase
agreements. (See Note 5.)
|
The
following table presents information about the Company's MBS that are pledged as
collateral under repurchase agreements based upon the term to maturity of the
repurchase agreements at March 31, 2008.
Term
to Contractual Maturity on Repurchase Agreement
|
||||||||||||||||||||
MBS
Collateral
|
Fair
Value of Collateral
|
Up
to
30
Days
|
30
to 90
Days
|
Over
90
Days
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Agency
MBS
|
$ | 7,592,853 | $ | 3,200,540 | $ | 2,187,751 | $ | 1,677,821 | $ | 7,066,112 | ||||||||||
AAA
Rated
|
309,142 | 192,055 | 53,600 | - | 245,655 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 7,901,995 | $ | 3,392,595 | $ | 2,241,351 | $ | 1,677,821 | $ | 7,311,767 |
8. Commitments
and Contingencies
Lease
Commitments and Contingencies
The
Company pays monthly rent pursuant to two separate operating
leases. The Company’s lease for its corporate headquarters extends
through April 30, 2017 and provides for aggregate cash payments ranging from
approximately $1.1 million to $1.4 million per year, exclusive of escalation
charges and landlord incentives. In connection with this lease, the
Company established a $350,000 irrevocable standby letter of credit in lieu of
lease security for the benefit of the landlord through April 30,
2017. The letter of credit may be drawn upon by the landlord in the
event that the Company defaults under certain terms of the lease. In
addition, at March 31, 2008, the Company had a lease through December 2011 for
its off-site back-up facility located in Rockville Centre, New York, which
provides for, among other things, rent of approximately $27,000 per
year.
9. Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Following
is a description of the Company’s valuation methodologies for financial assets
and liabilities measured at fair value in accordance with FAS
157. Such valuation methodologies were applied to the Company’s
financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value. The Company
has established and documented processes for determining fair
values. Fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where
available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, then fair
value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use inputs that
are market-based or independently-sourced market parameters, including interest
rate yield curves.
19
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
A
financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based
upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement. The three levels of valuation hierarchy established by
FAS 157 are defined as follows:
Level 1 – inputs to the
valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or
liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 – inputs to the
valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities
in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability,
either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument.
Level 3 – inputs to the
valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value
measurement.
The
following describes the valuation methodologies used for the Company’s financial
instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of
such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
Investment
Securities
The
Company’s investment securities, which are primarily comprised of Agency
ARM-MBS, are valued by a third-party pricing service that provides pool-specific
evaluations. The pricing service is provided daily To-Be-Announced
(“TBA”) securities (TBA securities are liquid and have quoted market prices and
represent the most actively traded class of MBS) evaluations from an ARMs
trading desk and Bond Equivalent Effective Margins (“BEEMs”) of actively traded
ARMs. Based on government bond research, prepayment models are
developed for various types of ARM-MBS by the pricing service. Using
the prepayment speeds, the pricing service calculates the BEEMs of actively
traded ARM-MBS. These BEEMs are further adjusted by trader maintained
matrix/logic based on other ARM-MBS characteristics such as, but not limited to,
index, reset date, collateral types, life cap, periodic cap, seasoning or age of
security. The pricing service determines prepayment speeds for a
given pool. Given the specific prepayment speed and the BEEM, the
corresponding evaluation for the specific pool is computed using a cash flow
generator with current TBA settlement day. The income approach
technique is then used for the valuation of the Company’s investment
securities. The Company’s investment securities are primarily valued
based upon readily observable market parameters and are classified as Level 2
fair values.
Swaps
The
Company’s Swaps are valued using external third-party bid quotes and internally
developed models that apply readily observable market parameters. The
Company’s Swaps are classified as Level 2 fair values.
The
following table presents the Company’s financial instruments carried at fair
value as of March 31, 2008, on the consolidated balance sheet by FAS 157
valuation hierarchy, as previously described.
Fair
Value at March 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Investment
securities
|
$ | - | $ | 8,115,988 | $ | - | $ | 8,115,988 | ||||||||
Swaps
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total
assets carried at fair value
|
- | 8,115,988 | - | 8,115,988 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Swaps
|
- | 141,584 | - | 141,584 | ||||||||||||
Total
liabilities carried at fair value
|
$ | - | $ | 141,584 | $ | - | $ | 141,584 |
Any
changes to the valuation methodology are reviewed by management to ensure the
changes are appropriate. As markets and products develop and the
pricing for certain products becomes more transparent, the Company continues to
refine its valuation methodologies. The methods described above may
produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable
value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the
Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other
market participants, the use of different methodologies, or assumptions, to
determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a
different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. The Company
uses inputs that are current as of the measurement date, which may include
periods of market dislocation, during which price transparency may be
reduced. This condition could cause the Company’s financial
instruments to be reclassified from Level 2 to Level 3.
20
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
10. Stockholders’
Equity
(a)
Dividends on Preferred Stock
The
following table presents dividends declared by the Company on its preferred
stock, from January 1, 2007 through March 31, 2008.
Year
|
Declaration
Date
|
Record
Date
|
Payment
Date
|
Cash
Dividend
Per
Share
|
|||
2008
|
February
21, 2008
|
March
3, 2008
|
March
31, 2008
|
$ | 0.53125 | ||
2007
|
February
16, 2007
|
March
1, 2007
|
March
30, 2007
|
$ | 0.53125 | ||
May
21, 2007
|
June
1, 2007
|
June
29, 2007
|
0.53125 | ||||
August
24, 2007
|
September
4, 2007
|
September
28, 2007
|
0.53125 | ||||
November
21, 2007
|
December
3, 2007
|
December
31, 2007
|
0.53125 |
(b)
Dividends on Common Stock
The
Company typically declares quarterly cash dividends on its common stock in the
month following the close of each calendar quarter, except that dividends for
the fourth quarter of each year are declared in that quarter for tax reasons
related to its REIT qualification.
On April
1, 2008, the Company declared its 2008 first quarter common stock dividend of
$0.18, payable on April 30, 2008, to stockholders of record on April 14,
2008. (See Note 15.) The following table presents
dividends declared by the Company on its common stock from January 1, 2007
through March 31, 2008:
Declaration
Date
|
Record
Date
|
Payment
Date
|
Cash
Dividend
Per
Share
|
|||
April
3, 2007
|
April
13, 2007
|
April
30, 2007
|
$ | 0.080 | ||
July
2, 2007
|
July
13, 2007
|
July
31, 2007
|
0.090 | |||
October
1, 2007
|
October
12, 2007
|
October
31, 2007
|
0.100 | |||
December
13, 2007
|
December
31, 2007
|
January
31, 2008
|
0.145 |
(c)
Shelf Registrations
On
October 19, 2007, the Company filed an automatic shelf registration statement on
Form S-3 with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933
Act”), with respect to an indeterminate amount of common stock, preferred stock,
depositary shares representing preferred stock and/or warrants that may be sold
by the Company from time to time pursuant to Rule 415 of the 1933
Act. Pursuant to Rule 462(e) of the 1933 Act, this registration
statement became effective automatically upon filing with the SEC. On
November 5, 2007, the Company filed a post-effective amendment to this automatic
shelf registration statement, which became effective automatically upon filing
with the SEC.
On
December 17, 2004, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-8 with
the SEC under the 1933 Act for the purpose of registering additional common
stock for issuance in connection with the exercise of awards under the Company’s
2004 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2004 Plan”), which amended and restated the
Company’s Second Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option Plan (the “1997
Plan”). This registration statement became effective automatically
upon filing and, when combined with the previously registered, but unissued,
portions of the Company’s prior registration statements on Form S-8 relating to
awards under the 1997 Plan, related to an aggregate of 3.3 million shares of
common stock, of which 1.9 million shares remained available for issuance at
March 31, 2008.
On
December 17, 2004, the Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3
with the SEC under the 1933 Act for the purpose of registering additional common
stock for sale through the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Repurchase Plan
(“DRSPP”). This shelf registration statement was declared effective
by the SEC on January 4, 2005 and, when combined with the unused portion of the
Company’s previous DRSPP shelf registration statement, registered an aggregate
of 10 million shares of common stock. At March 31, 2008, 8.5 million
shares of common stock remained available for issuance pursuant to the DRSPP
shelf registration statement.
21
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
(d)
Public Offerings of
Common Stock
On
January 23, 2008, the Company completed a public offering of 28,750,000 shares
of common stock, which included the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment
option in full, at a public offering price of $9.25 per share and received net
proceeds of approximately $253.0 million after the payment of underwriting
discounts and commissions and related expenses.
(e)
DRSPP
The
Company’s DRSPP is designed to provide existing stockholders and new investors
with a convenient and economical way to purchase shares of common stock through
the automatic reinvestment of dividends and/or optional monthly cash
investments. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the
Company issued 5,769 shares of common stock through the DRSPP, raising net
proceeds of $52,000. From the inception of the DRSPP in September
2003, through March 31, 2008, the Company issued 13,047,487 shares pursuant to
the DRSPP raising net proceeds of $119.0 million.
(f)
Controlled Equity Offering Program
On August
20, 2004, the Company initiated a controlled equity offering program (the “CEO
Program”) through which it may, from time to time, publicly offer and sell
shares of common stock through Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (“Cantor”) in
privately negotiated and/or at-the-market transactions. The Company
did not issue any shares of common stock in at-the-market transactions through
the CEO Program during the three months ended March 31, 2008. From
inception of the CEO Program through March 31, 2008, the Company issued
6,500,815 shares of common stock in at-the-market transactions through such
program raising net proceeds of $51,543,121 and, in connection with such
transactions, paid Cantor fees and commissions of $1,263,421. Shares
for the CEO Program are issued through the automatic shelf registration
statement on Form S-3 that was filed on October 19, 2007, as
amended.
(g)
Stock Repurchase Program
On August
11, 2005, the Company announced the implementation of a stock repurchase program
(the “Repurchase Program”) to repurchase up to 4.0 million shares of its
outstanding common stock. Subject to applicable securities laws,
repurchases of common stock under the Repurchase Program are made at times and
in amounts as the Company deems appropriate, using available cash
resources. Shares of common stock repurchased by the Company under
the Repurchase Program are cancelled and, until reissued by the Company, are
deemed to be the authorized but unissued shares of the Company’s common
stock.
On May 2,
2006, the Company announced an increase in the size of the Repurchase Program,
by an additional 3,191,200 shares of common stock, resetting the number of
shares of common stock that the Company is authorized to repurchase to 4.0
million shares, all of which remained authorized for repurchase at March 31,
2008. The Repurchase Program may be suspended or discontinued by the
Company at any time and without prior notice. The Company has not
repurchased any shares of its common stock under the Repurchase Program since
April 2006. From inception of the Repurchase Program in April 2005
through April 2006, the Company repurchased 3,191,200 shares of common stock at
an average cost of $5.90 per share.
22
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
11. EPS
Calculation
The
following table presents a reconciliation of the earnings and shares used in
calculating basic and diluted EPS for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007.
Three
Months Ended
March 31,
|
||||||||
(In
Thousands, except per share amounts)
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Numerator:
|
||||||||
Net
(loss)/ income to common stockholders:
|
||||||||
Net
(loss)/income
|
$ | (85,943 | ) | $ | 9,850 | |||
Dividends
declared on preferred stock
|
(2,040 | ) | (2,040 | ) | ||||
Net
(loss)/income to common stockholders for basic and
diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | (87,983 | ) | $ | 7,810 | |||
Denominators:
|
||||||||
Weighted
average common shares for basic earnings per share
|
144,710 | 80,762 | ||||||
Weighted
average dilutive employee stock options (1)
|
87 | 33 | ||||||
Denominator
for diluted earnings per share (1)
|
144,710 | 80,795 | ||||||
Basic
and diluted net (loss)/earnings per share:
|
$ | (0.61 | ) | $ | 0.10 | |||
(1)
The impact of dilutive stock options is not included in the computation of
earnings per share for the three months ended Match 31, 2008, as their
inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
|
12. Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was as
follows:
(In
Thousands)
|
March 31,
2008
|
December 31,
2007
|
||||||
Available-for-sale
Investment Securities:
|
||||||||
Unrealized
gains
|
$ | 88,001 | $ | 48,611 | ||||
Unrealized
(losses)
|
(57,873 | ) | (19,379 | ) | ||||
30,128 | 29,232 | |||||||
Hedging
Instruments:
|
||||||||
Unrealized
(losses) on Swaps, net
|
(141,584 | ) | (99,733 | ) | ||||
(141,584 | ) | (99,733 | ) | |||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive (loss)
|
$ | (111,456 | ) | $ | (70,501 | ) |
13. Equity
Compensation, Employment Agreements and Other Benefit Plans
(a)
2004 Equity Compensation Plan
In
accordance with the terms of the 2004 Plan, directors, officers and employees of
the Company and any of its subsidiaries and other persons expected to provide
significant services (of a type expressly approved by the Compensation Committee
of the Board (“Compensation Committee”) as covered services for these purposes)
for the Company and any of its subsidiaries are eligible to receive grants of
stock options (“Options”), restricted stock, RSUs, DERs and other stock-based
awards under the 2004 Plan.
In
general, subject to certain exceptions, stock-based awards relating to a maximum
of 3.5 million shares of common stock may be granted under the 2004 Plan;
forfeitures and/or awards that expire unexercised do not count towards such
limit. At March 31, 2008, 1.9 million shares of common stock remained
available for grant in connection with stock-based awards under the 2004
Plan. Subject to certain exceptions, a participant may not receive
stock-based awards in excess of 500,000 shares of common stock in any one-year
and no award may be granted to any person who, assuming exercise of all Options
and payment of all awards held by such person, would own or be deemed to own
more than 9.8% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s capital
stock. Unless previously terminated by the Board, awards may be
granted under the 2004 Plan until the tenth anniversary of the
23
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
date that
the Company’s stockholders approved such plan.
A DER is
a right to receive, as specified by the Compensation Committee at the time of
grant, a distribution equal to the dividend that would be paid on a share of
common stock. DERs may be granted separately or together with other
awards and are paid in cash or other consideration at such times, and in
accordance with such rules, as the Compensation Committee shall determine at its
discretion. Distributions are made with respect to vested DERs only
to the extent of ordinary income and DERs are not entitled to distributions
representing a return of capital. Payments made on the Company’s DERs
are charged to stockholders’ equity when the corresponding common stock
dividends are declared. The Company made DER payments of
approximately $187,000 and $57,000, respectively, during the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007 for common stock dividends declared in the previous
December. At March 31, 2008, the Company had 1,035,892 DERs
outstanding, all of which were entitled to receive dividends.
Options
Pursuant
to Section 422(b) of the Code, in order for stock options granted under the 2004
Plan and vesting in any one calendar year to qualify as an incentive stock
option (“ISO”) for tax purposes, the market value of the Company’s common stock,
as determined on the date of grant, shall not exceed $100,000 during such
calendar year. The exercise price of an ISO may not be lower than
100% (110% in the case of an ISO granted to a 10% stockholder) of the fair
market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The
exercise price for any other type of Option issued under the 2004 Plan may not
be less than the fair market value on the date of grant. Each Option
is exercisable after the period or periods specified in the award agreement,
which will generally not exceed ten years from the date of
grant. Options will be exercisable at such times and subject to such
terms set forth in the related Option award agreement, which terms are
determined by the Compensation Committee.
At March
31, 2008, 707,000 Options were outstanding under the 2004 Plan, all of which
were vested and exercisable, with a weighted average exercise price of
$9.32. No Options were granted and no Options expired during the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007. During the
three months ended March 31, 2008, 255,000 Options were exercised and no Options
were exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2007. As of
March 31, 2008, the aggregate intrinsic value of total Options outstanding was
$143,000.
Restricted
Stock
During
the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company issued 10,811 and
20,504 shares of restricted common stock, respectively. At March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had unrecognized compensation expense of
$181,000 and $200,000, respectively, related to unvested shares of restricted
common stock.
Restricted
Stock Units
An RSU is
a right to receive, subject to the satisfaction of conditions set by the
Compensation Committee at the time of grant, a payment of a specified value,
which, as specified by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant, may be a
share of the Company’s common stock, the fair market value of a share of the
Company’s common stock or such fair market value to the extent in excess of an
established base value, on the applicable settlement date. On
October 26, 2007, the Company granted an aggregate of 326,392 RSUs, together
with DERs attached to certain of the Company’s employees under the 2004
Plan. At March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, all of the Company’s
RSUs outstanding were subject to cliff vesting on December 31, 2010 or earlier
in the event of death or disability of the grantee or termination of an employee
for any reason, other than “cause,” as defined in the related RSU award
agreement. RSUs will be settled in shares of the Company’s common
stock on the earlier of a termination of service, a change in control or on
January 1, 2013, as described in the related award agreement. At
March 31, 2008, the Company had unrecognized compensation expense of $2.4
million related to the unvested RSUs.
24
MFA
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The
following table presents expenses recorded by the Company related to its equity
based compensation instruments for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007.
Three
Months Ended
March 31,
|
||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Options
|
$ | - | $ | 9 | ||||
Restricted
shares of common stock
|
119 | 165 | ||||||
RSUs
|
223 | - | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 342 | $ | 174 |
(b)
Employment Agreements
The
Company has employment agreements with five of its senior officers, with varying
terms that provide for, among other things, base salary, bonus and
change-in-control provisions that are subject to the occurrence of certain
triggering events.
(c)
Deferred Compensation Plans
The
Company administers the MFA Mortgage Investments, Inc. 2003 Non-employee
Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan and the MFA Mortgage Investments, Inc.
Senior Officers Deferred Bonus Plan (collectively, the “Deferred
Plans”). Pursuant to the Deferred Plans, participants may elect to
defer a certain percentage of their compensation. The Deferred Plans
are intended to provide participants with an opportunity to defer up to 100% of
certain compensation, as defined in the Deferred Plans, while at the same time
aligning their interests with the interests of the Company’s
stockholders.
Amounts
deferred are considered to be converted into “stock units” of the
Company. Stock units do not represent stock of the Company, but
rather represent a liability of the Company that increases or decreases in value
as would equivalent shares of the Company’s common stock. Deferred
compensation liabilities are settled in cash at the termination of the deferral
period, based on the value of the stock units at that time. The
Deferred Plans are non-qualified plans under the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act and, as such, are not funded. Prior to the time that the
deferred accounts are settled, participants are unsecured creditors of the
Company. Effective January 1, 2007, the Board suspended indefinitely
the non-employee directors’ abili